Behavioral science licensure: Merit and applications
Author(s) / Creator(s)
Fulmer, Russell
Kezele, Jordan
Abstract / Description
This article provides an overview of occupational licensure as applied to the behavioral sciences. Licensure enactment is inherently an interdisciplinary phenomenon with educational, ethical, and community welfare implications. The aim of the current study is to conduct a review of the literature pertaining to licensure and compare the findings with the ethics code of the American Counseling Association. The results reveal that the common reasons given for licensure are of questionable validity. Voluntary certification is suggested as a viable alternative.
Keyword(s)
licensure certification professional ethics code human rights self-actualizationPersistent Identifier
Date of first publication
2018-10-31
Journal title
Psychological Thought
Volume
11
Issue
2
Page numbers
54–61
Publisher
PsychOpen GOLD
Publication status
publishedVersion
Review status
peerReviewed
Is version of
Citation
Fulmer, R., & Kezele, J. (2018). Behavioral science licensure: Merit and applications. Psychological Thought, 11(2), 54–61. https://doi.org/10.5964/psyct.v11i2.283
-
psyct.v11i2.283.pdfAdobe PDF - 195.13KBMD5: 9cde81ff330c39b52e5146aae42f03ec
-
There are no other versions of this object.
-
Author(s) / Creator(s)Fulmer, Russell
-
Author(s) / Creator(s)Kezele, Jordan
-
PsychArchives acquisition timestamp2018-11-28T10:01:40Z
-
Made available on2018-11-28T10:01:40Z
-
Date of first publication2018-10-31
-
Abstract / DescriptionThis article provides an overview of occupational licensure as applied to the behavioral sciences. Licensure enactment is inherently an interdisciplinary phenomenon with educational, ethical, and community welfare implications. The aim of the current study is to conduct a review of the literature pertaining to licensure and compare the findings with the ethics code of the American Counseling Association. The results reveal that the common reasons given for licensure are of questionable validity. Voluntary certification is suggested as a viable alternative.en_US
-
Publication statuspublishedVersion
-
Review statuspeerReviewed
-
CitationFulmer, R., & Kezele, J. (2018). Behavioral science licensure: Merit and applications. Psychological Thought, 11(2), 54–61. https://doi.org/10.5964/psyct.v11i2.283en_US
-
ISSN2193-7281
-
Persistent Identifierhttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12034/1515
-
Persistent Identifierhttps://doi.org/10.23668/psycharchives.1881
-
Language of contenteng
-
PublisherPsychOpen GOLD
-
Is version ofhttps://doi.org/10.5964/psyct.v11i2.283
-
Keyword(s)licensureen_US
-
Keyword(s)certificationen_US
-
Keyword(s)professional ethics codeen_US
-
Keyword(s)human rightsen_US
-
Keyword(s)self-actualizationen_US
-
Dewey Decimal Classification number(s)150
-
TitleBehavioral science licensure: Merit and applicationsen_US
-
DRO typearticle
-
Issue2
-
Journal titlePsychological Thought
-
Page numbers54–61
-
Volume11
-
Visible tag(s)Version of Record