A closer look at intergroup threat within the dual process model framework: The mediating role of moral foundations
Author(s) / Creator(s)
Hadarics, Márton
Kende, Anna
Abstract / Description
In our study we investigated how right-wing authoritarianism (RWA) and social dominance orientation (SDO) are related to perceived intergroup threat, and also tested the potential mediating role of individualizing and binding moral foundations within this relationship pattern. According to our results, both RWA and SDO enhanced the perceived threat related to immigration. Furthermore, the effect of SDO was partly mediated by individualizing moral foundations, while the effect of RWA was partly mediated by both kinds of moral foundations. It seems that perceived intergroup threat, at least to some extent, is influenced by personal moral preferences that can be derived from individual dispositions and motivations.
Keyword(s)
right-wing authoritarianism social dominance orientation moral foundations intergroup threat motivated social cognitionPersistent Identifier
Date of first publication
2017-04-28
Journal title
Psychological Thought
Volume
10
Issue
1
Page numbers
167–177
Publisher
PsychOpen GOLD
Publication status
publishedVersion
Review status
peerReviewed
Is version of
Citation
Hadarics, M., & Kende, A. (2017). A closer look at intergroup threat within the dual process model framework: The mediating role of moral foundations. Psychological Thought, 10(1), 167–177. https://doi.org/10.5964/psyct.v10i1.210
-
psyct.v10i1.210.pdfAdobe PDF - 321.18KBMD5: 7fa89afd8cbc5cfb4fb0a1caafddfa84
-
There are no other versions of this object.
-
Author(s) / Creator(s)Hadarics, Márton
-
Author(s) / Creator(s)Kende, Anna
-
PsychArchives acquisition timestamp2018-11-28T10:01:34Z
-
Made available on2018-11-28T10:01:34Z
-
Date of first publication2017-04-28
-
Abstract / DescriptionIn our study we investigated how right-wing authoritarianism (RWA) and social dominance orientation (SDO) are related to perceived intergroup threat, and also tested the potential mediating role of individualizing and binding moral foundations within this relationship pattern. According to our results, both RWA and SDO enhanced the perceived threat related to immigration. Furthermore, the effect of SDO was partly mediated by individualizing moral foundations, while the effect of RWA was partly mediated by both kinds of moral foundations. It seems that perceived intergroup threat, at least to some extent, is influenced by personal moral preferences that can be derived from individual dispositions and motivations.en_US
-
Publication statuspublishedVersion
-
Review statuspeerReviewed
-
CitationHadarics, M., & Kende, A. (2017). A closer look at intergroup threat within the dual process model framework: The mediating role of moral foundations. Psychological Thought, 10(1), 167–177. https://doi.org/10.5964/psyct.v10i1.210en_US
-
ISSN2193-7281
-
Persistent Identifierhttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12034/1492
-
Persistent Identifierhttps://doi.org/10.23668/psycharchives.1858
-
Language of contenteng
-
PublisherPsychOpen GOLD
-
Is version ofhttps://doi.org/10.5964/psyct.v10i1.210
-
Keyword(s)right-wing authoritarianismen_US
-
Keyword(s)social dominance orientationen_US
-
Keyword(s)moral foundationsen_US
-
Keyword(s)intergroup threaten_US
-
Keyword(s)motivated social cognitionen_US
-
Dewey Decimal Classification number(s)150
-
TitleA closer look at intergroup threat within the dual process model framework: The mediating role of moral foundationsen_US
-
DRO typearticle
-
Issue1
-
Journal titlePsychological Thought
-
Page numbers167–177
-
Volume10
-
Visible tag(s)Version of Record