Article Version of Record

A closer look at intergroup threat within the dual process model framework: The mediating role of moral foundations

Author(s) / Creator(s)

Hadarics, Márton
Kende, Anna

Abstract / Description

In our study we investigated how right-wing authoritarianism (RWA) and social dominance orientation (SDO) are related to perceived intergroup threat, and also tested the potential mediating role of individualizing and binding moral foundations within this relationship pattern. According to our results, both RWA and SDO enhanced the perceived threat related to immigration. Furthermore, the effect of SDO was partly mediated by individualizing moral foundations, while the effect of RWA was partly mediated by both kinds of moral foundations. It seems that perceived intergroup threat, at least to some extent, is influenced by personal moral preferences that can be derived from individual dispositions and motivations.

Keyword(s)

right-wing authoritarianism social dominance orientation moral foundations intergroup threat motivated social cognition

Persistent Identifier

Date of first publication

2017-04-28

Journal title

Psychological Thought

Volume

10

Issue

1

Page numbers

167–177

Publisher

PsychOpen GOLD

Publication status

publishedVersion

Review status

peerReviewed

Is version of

Citation

Hadarics, M., & Kende, A. (2017). A closer look at intergroup threat within the dual process model framework: The mediating role of moral foundations. Psychological Thought, 10(1), 167–177. https://doi.org/10.5964/psyct.v10i1.210
  • Author(s) / Creator(s)
    Hadarics, Márton
  • Author(s) / Creator(s)
    Kende, Anna
  • PsychArchives acquisition timestamp
    2018-11-28T10:01:34Z
  • Made available on
    2018-11-28T10:01:34Z
  • Date of first publication
    2017-04-28
  • Abstract / Description
    In our study we investigated how right-wing authoritarianism (RWA) and social dominance orientation (SDO) are related to perceived intergroup threat, and also tested the potential mediating role of individualizing and binding moral foundations within this relationship pattern. According to our results, both RWA and SDO enhanced the perceived threat related to immigration. Furthermore, the effect of SDO was partly mediated by individualizing moral foundations, while the effect of RWA was partly mediated by both kinds of moral foundations. It seems that perceived intergroup threat, at least to some extent, is influenced by personal moral preferences that can be derived from individual dispositions and motivations.
    en_US
  • Publication status
    publishedVersion
  • Review status
    peerReviewed
  • Citation
    Hadarics, M., & Kende, A. (2017). A closer look at intergroup threat within the dual process model framework: The mediating role of moral foundations. Psychological Thought, 10(1), 167–177. https://doi.org/10.5964/psyct.v10i1.210
    en_US
  • ISSN
    2193-7281
  • Persistent Identifier
    https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12034/1492
  • Persistent Identifier
    https://doi.org/10.23668/psycharchives.1858
  • Language of content
    eng
  • Publisher
    PsychOpen GOLD
  • Is version of
    https://doi.org/10.5964/psyct.v10i1.210
  • Keyword(s)
    right-wing authoritarianism
    en_US
  • Keyword(s)
    social dominance orientation
    en_US
  • Keyword(s)
    moral foundations
    en_US
  • Keyword(s)
    intergroup threat
    en_US
  • Keyword(s)
    motivated social cognition
    en_US
  • Dewey Decimal Classification number(s)
    150
  • Title
    A closer look at intergroup threat within the dual process model framework: The mediating role of moral foundations
    en_US
  • DRO type
    article
  • Issue
    1
  • Journal title
    Psychological Thought
  • Page numbers
    167–177
  • Volume
    10
  • Visible tag(s)
    Version of Record