Article Version of Record

Political Left and Right: Our Hands-On Logic

Author(s) / Creator(s)

Bienfait, Frits
van Beek, Walter E. A.

Abstract / Description

The origins and immediate vitality of the left/right divide which emerged in French revolutionary politics from 1789 can only be understood against the background of a much older classification dynamic based on the primacy of the right hand, first described by Robert Hertz in 1909. This dynamic infused political thinking first in Versailles and since 1815 in democracies throughout the world. In the process, the classical left/right polarity acquired a new dimension: the complementary notions of ‘accepting’ and ‘questioning’ the existing social order. An essential feature of both the age-old classical polarity and the ensuing political polarity is that they are intimately bound up with local and evolving social contexts: there is no single content-based definition of left and right. As long as the majority of us are predisposed to use our right hand when acting in the world, ‘left versus right’ will remain the most important political antithesis in western-type democracies.

Keyword(s)

political left political right polarity Hertz classification order anthropology cultures

Persistent Identifier

Date of first publication

2014-12-10

Journal title

Journal of Social and Political Psychology

Volume

2

Issue

1

Page numbers

335–346

Publisher

PsychOpen GOLD

Publication status

publishedVersion

Review status

peerReviewed

Is version of

Citation

Bienfait, F., & van Beek, W. E. A. (2014). Political Left and Right: Our Hands-On Logic. Journal of Social and Political Psychology, 2(1), 335–346. https://doi.org/10.5964/jspp.v2i1.323
  • Author(s) / Creator(s)
    Bienfait, Frits
  • Author(s) / Creator(s)
    van Beek, Walter E. A.
  • PsychArchives acquisition timestamp
    2018-11-26T12:44:44Z
  • Made available on
    2018-11-26T12:44:44Z
  • Date of first publication
    2014-12-10
  • Abstract / Description
    The origins and immediate vitality of the left/right divide which emerged in French revolutionary politics from 1789 can only be understood against the background of a much older classification dynamic based on the primacy of the right hand, first described by Robert Hertz in 1909. This dynamic infused political thinking first in Versailles and since 1815 in democracies throughout the world. In the process, the classical left/right polarity acquired a new dimension: the complementary notions of ‘accepting’ and ‘questioning’ the existing social order. An essential feature of both the age-old classical polarity and the ensuing political polarity is that they are intimately bound up with local and evolving social contexts: there is no single content-based definition of left and right. As long as the majority of us are predisposed to use our right hand when acting in the world, ‘left versus right’ will remain the most important political antithesis in western-type democracies.
    en_US
  • Publication status
    publishedVersion
  • Review status
    peerReviewed
  • Citation
    Bienfait, F., & van Beek, W. E. A. (2014). Political Left and Right: Our Hands-On Logic. Journal of Social and Political Psychology, 2(1), 335–346. https://doi.org/10.5964/jspp.v2i1.323
    en_US
  • ISSN
    2195-3325
  • Persistent Identifier
    https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12034/1347
  • Persistent Identifier
    https://doi.org/10.23668/psycharchives.1703
  • Language of content
    eng
  • Publisher
    PsychOpen GOLD
  • Is version of
    https://doi.org/10.5964/jspp.v2i1.323
  • Keyword(s)
    political left
    en_US
  • Keyword(s)
    political right
    en_US
  • Keyword(s)
    polarity
    en_US
  • Keyword(s)
    Hertz
    en_US
  • Keyword(s)
    classification
    en_US
  • Keyword(s)
    order
    en_US
  • Keyword(s)
    anthropology
    en_US
  • Keyword(s)
    cultures
    en_US
  • Dewey Decimal Classification number(s)
    150
  • Title
    Political Left and Right: Our Hands-On Logic
    en_US
  • DRO type
    article
  • Issue
    1
  • Journal title
    Journal of Social and Political Psychology
  • Page numbers
    335–346
  • Volume
    2
  • Visible tag(s)
    Version of Record