Article Version of Record

How and why do number-space associations co-vary in implicit and explicit magnitude processing tasks?

Author(s) / Creator(s)

Georges, Carrie
Hoffmann, Danielle
Schiltz, Christine

Abstract / Description

Evidence for number-space associations in implicit and explicit magnitude processing tasks comes from the parity and magnitude SNARC effect respectively. Different spatial accounts were suggested to underlie these spatial-numerical associations (SNAs) with some inconsistencies in the literature. To determine whether the parity and magnitude SNAs arise from a single predominant account or task-dependent coding mechanisms, we adopted an individual differences approach to study their correlation and the extent of their association with arithmetic performance, spatial visualization ability and visualization profile. Additionally, we performed moderation analyses to determine whether the relation between these SNAs depended on individual differences in those cognitive factors. The parity and magnitude SNAs did not correlate and were differentially predicted by arithmetic performance and visualization profile respectively. These variables, however, also moderated the relation between the SNAs. While positive correlations were observed in object-visualizers with lower arithmetic performances, correlations were negative in spatial-visualizers with higher arithmetic performances. This suggests the predominance of a single account for both implicit and explicit SNAs in the two types of visualizers. However, the spatial nature of the account differs between object- and spatial-visualizers. No relation occurred in mixed-visualizers, indicating the activation of task-dependent coding mechanisms. Individual differences in arithmetic performance and visualization profile thus determined whether SNAs in implicit and explicit tasks co-varied and supposedly relied on similar or unrelated spatial coding mechanisms. This explains some inconsistencies in the literature regarding SNAs and highlights the usefulness of moderation analyses for understanding how the relation between different numerical concepts varies between individuals.

Keyword(s)

parity SNA magnitude SNA visualization style arithmetic performance individual differences moderation analysis

Persistent Identifier

Date of first publication

2017-12-22

Journal title

Journal of Numerical Cognition

Volume

3

Issue

2

Page numbers

182–211

Publisher

PsychOpen GOLD

Publication status

publishedVersion

Review status

peerReviewed

Is version of

Citation

Georges, C., Hoffmann, D., & Schiltz, C. (2017). How and why do number-space associations co-vary in implicit and explicit magnitude processing tasks? Journal of Numerical Cognition, 3(2), 182–211. https://doi.org/10.5964/jnc.v3i2.46
  • Author(s) / Creator(s)
    Georges, Carrie
  • Author(s) / Creator(s)
    Hoffmann, Danielle
  • Author(s) / Creator(s)
    Schiltz, Christine
  • PsychArchives acquisition timestamp
    2018-11-21T11:42:46Z
  • Made available on
    2018-11-21T11:42:46Z
  • Date of first publication
    2017-12-22
  • Abstract / Description
    Evidence for number-space associations in implicit and explicit magnitude processing tasks comes from the parity and magnitude SNARC effect respectively. Different spatial accounts were suggested to underlie these spatial-numerical associations (SNAs) with some inconsistencies in the literature. To determine whether the parity and magnitude SNAs arise from a single predominant account or task-dependent coding mechanisms, we adopted an individual differences approach to study their correlation and the extent of their association with arithmetic performance, spatial visualization ability and visualization profile. Additionally, we performed moderation analyses to determine whether the relation between these SNAs depended on individual differences in those cognitive factors. The parity and magnitude SNAs did not correlate and were differentially predicted by arithmetic performance and visualization profile respectively. These variables, however, also moderated the relation between the SNAs. While positive correlations were observed in object-visualizers with lower arithmetic performances, correlations were negative in spatial-visualizers with higher arithmetic performances. This suggests the predominance of a single account for both implicit and explicit SNAs in the two types of visualizers. However, the spatial nature of the account differs between object- and spatial-visualizers. No relation occurred in mixed-visualizers, indicating the activation of task-dependent coding mechanisms. Individual differences in arithmetic performance and visualization profile thus determined whether SNAs in implicit and explicit tasks co-varied and supposedly relied on similar or unrelated spatial coding mechanisms. This explains some inconsistencies in the literature regarding SNAs and highlights the usefulness of moderation analyses for understanding how the relation between different numerical concepts varies between individuals.
    en_US
  • Publication status
    publishedVersion
  • Review status
    peerReviewed
  • Citation
    Georges, C., Hoffmann, D., & Schiltz, C. (2017). How and why do number-space associations co-vary in implicit and explicit magnitude processing tasks? Journal of Numerical Cognition, 3(2), 182–211. https://doi.org/10.5964/jnc.v3i2.46
    en_US
  • ISSN
    2363-8761
  • Persistent Identifier
    https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12034/1259
  • Persistent Identifier
    https://doi.org/10.23668/psycharchives.1451
  • Language of content
    eng
  • Publisher
    PsychOpen GOLD
  • Is version of
    https://doi.org/10.5964/jnc.v3i2.46
  • Keyword(s)
    parity SNA
    en_US
  • Keyword(s)
    magnitude SNA
    en_US
  • Keyword(s)
    visualization style
    en_US
  • Keyword(s)
    arithmetic performance
    en_US
  • Keyword(s)
    individual differences
    en_US
  • Keyword(s)
    moderation analysis
    en_US
  • Dewey Decimal Classification number(s)
    150
  • Title
    How and why do number-space associations co-vary in implicit and explicit magnitude processing tasks?
    en_US
  • DRO type
    article
  • Issue
    2
  • Journal title
    Journal of Numerical Cognition
  • Page numbers
    182–211
  • Volume
    3
  • Visible tag(s)
    Version of Record