Article Version of Record

Do we have a sense for irrational numbers?

Author(s) / Creator(s)

Obersteiner, Andreas
Hofreiter, Veronika

Abstract / Description

Number sense requires, at least, an ability to assess magnitude information represented by number symbols. Most educated adults are able to assess magnitude information of rational numbers fairly quickly, including whole numbers and fractions. It is to date unclear whether educated adults without training are able to assess magnitudes of irrational numbers, such as the cube root of 41. In a computerized experiment, we asked mathematically skilled adults to repeatedly choose the larger of two irrational numbers as quickly as possible. Participants were highly accurate on problems in which reasoning about the exact or approximate value of the irrational numbers’ whole number components (e.g., 3 and 41 in the cube root of 41) yielded the correct response. However, they performed at random chance level when these strategies were invalid and the problem required reasoning about the irrational number magnitudes as a whole. Response times suggested that participants hardly even tried to assess magnitudes of the irrational numbers as a whole, and if they did, were largely unsuccessful. We conclude that even mathematically skilled adults struggle with quickly assessing magnitudes of irrational numbers in their symbolic notation. Without practice, number sense seems to be restricted to rational numbers.

Keyword(s)

number sense magnitude representation number comparison natural number bias numerical distance effect

Persistent Identifier

Date of first publication

2017-02-10

Journal title

Journal of Numerical Cognition

Volume

2

Issue

3

Page numbers

170–189

Publisher

PsychOpen GOLD

Publication status

publishedVersion

Review status

peerReviewed

Is version of

Citation

Obersteiner, A., & Hofreiter, V. (2017). Do we have a sense for irrational numbers? Journal of Numerical Cognition, 2(3), 170–189. https://doi.org/10.5964/jnc.v2i3.43
  • Author(s) / Creator(s)
    Obersteiner, Andreas
  • Author(s) / Creator(s)
    Hofreiter, Veronika
  • PsychArchives acquisition timestamp
    2018-11-21T11:42:41Z
  • Made available on
    2018-11-21T11:42:41Z
  • Date of first publication
    2017-02-10
  • Abstract / Description
    Number sense requires, at least, an ability to assess magnitude information represented by number symbols. Most educated adults are able to assess magnitude information of rational numbers fairly quickly, including whole numbers and fractions. It is to date unclear whether educated adults without training are able to assess magnitudes of irrational numbers, such as the cube root of 41. In a computerized experiment, we asked mathematically skilled adults to repeatedly choose the larger of two irrational numbers as quickly as possible. Participants were highly accurate on problems in which reasoning about the exact or approximate value of the irrational numbers’ whole number components (e.g., 3 and 41 in the cube root of 41) yielded the correct response. However, they performed at random chance level when these strategies were invalid and the problem required reasoning about the irrational number magnitudes as a whole. Response times suggested that participants hardly even tried to assess magnitudes of the irrational numbers as a whole, and if they did, were largely unsuccessful. We conclude that even mathematically skilled adults struggle with quickly assessing magnitudes of irrational numbers in their symbolic notation. Without practice, number sense seems to be restricted to rational numbers.
    en_US
  • Publication status
    publishedVersion
  • Review status
    peerReviewed
  • Citation
    Obersteiner, A., & Hofreiter, V. (2017). Do we have a sense for irrational numbers? Journal of Numerical Cognition, 2(3), 170–189. https://doi.org/10.5964/jnc.v2i3.43
    en_US
  • ISSN
    2363-8761
  • Persistent Identifier
    https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12034/1242
  • Persistent Identifier
    https://doi.org/10.23668/psycharchives.1434
  • Language of content
    eng
  • Publisher
    PsychOpen GOLD
  • Is version of
    https://doi.org/10.5964/jnc.v2i3.43
  • Keyword(s)
    number sense
    en_US
  • Keyword(s)
    magnitude representation
    en_US
  • Keyword(s)
    number comparison
    en_US
  • Keyword(s)
    natural number bias
    en_US
  • Keyword(s)
    numerical distance effect
    en_US
  • Dewey Decimal Classification number(s)
    150
  • Title
    Do we have a sense for irrational numbers?
    en_US
  • DRO type
    article
  • Issue
    3
  • Journal title
    Journal of Numerical Cognition
  • Page numbers
    170–189
  • Volume
    2
  • Visible tag(s)
    Version of Record