Article Version of Record

Coefficient Alpha: Interpret With Caution

Author(s) / Creator(s)

Panayides, Panayiotis

Abstract / Description

Heavy reliance on Cronbach’s alpha has been standard practice in many validation studies. However, there seem to be two misconceptions about the interpretation of alpha. First, alpha is mistakenly considered as an indication of unidimensionality and second, that the higher the value of alpha the better. The aim of this study is to clarify these misconceptions with the use of real data from the educational setting. Results showed that high alpha values can be obtained in multidimensional scales or tests given a sufficient number of items. Therefore, alpha cannot be an indication of unidimensionality. At the same time, after a certain point, higher values of alpha do not necessarily mean higher reliability and better quality scales or tests. In fact very high values of alpha could be an indication of lengthy scales, parallel items or a narrow coverage of the construct under consideration. Researchers are advised to apply caution when reporting alpha.

Keyword(s)

coefficient alpha reliability unidimensionality

Persistent Identifier

Date of first publication

2013-11-29

Journal title

Europe's Journal of Psychology

Volume

9

Issue

4

Page numbers

687–696

Publisher

PsychOpen GOLD

Publication status

publishedVersion

Review status

peerReviewed

Is version of

Citation

Panayides, P. (2013). Coefficient Alpha: Interpret With Caution. Europe's Journal of Psychology, 9(4), 687–696. https://doi.org/10.5964/ejop.v9i4.653
  • Author(s) / Creator(s)
    Panayides, Panayiotis
  • PsychArchives acquisition timestamp
    2018-11-21T10:01:22Z
  • Made available on
    2018-11-21T10:01:22Z
  • Date of first publication
    2013-11-29
  • Abstract / Description
    Heavy reliance on Cronbach’s alpha has been standard practice in many validation studies. However, there seem to be two misconceptions about the interpretation of alpha. First, alpha is mistakenly considered as an indication of unidimensionality and second, that the higher the value of alpha the better. The aim of this study is to clarify these misconceptions with the use of real data from the educational setting. Results showed that high alpha values can be obtained in multidimensional scales or tests given a sufficient number of items. Therefore, alpha cannot be an indication of unidimensionality. At the same time, after a certain point, higher values of alpha do not necessarily mean higher reliability and better quality scales or tests. In fact very high values of alpha could be an indication of lengthy scales, parallel items or a narrow coverage of the construct under consideration. Researchers are advised to apply caution when reporting alpha.
    en_US
  • Publication status
    publishedVersion
  • Review status
    peerReviewed
  • Citation
    Panayides, P. (2013). Coefficient Alpha: Interpret With Caution. Europe's Journal of Psychology, 9(4), 687–696. https://doi.org/10.5964/ejop.v9i4.653
  • ISSN
    1841-0413
  • Persistent Identifier
    https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12034/1222
  • Persistent Identifier
    https://doi.org/10.23668/psycharchives.1414
  • Language of content
    eng
  • Publisher
    PsychOpen GOLD
  • Is version of
    https://doi.org/10.5964/ejop.v9i4.653
  • Keyword(s)
    coefficient alpha
    en_US
  • Keyword(s)
    reliability
    en_US
  • Keyword(s)
    unidimensionality
    en_US
  • Dewey Decimal Classification number(s)
    150
  • Title
    Coefficient Alpha: Interpret With Caution
    en_US
  • DRO type
    article
  • Issue
    4
  • Journal title
    Europe's Journal of Psychology
  • Page numbers
    687–696
  • Volume
    9
  • Visible tag(s)
    Version of Record