Article Version of Record

The possible as a field of inquiry

Author(s) / Creator(s)

Glăveanu, Vlad Petre

Abstract / Description

In this editorial I introduce the possible as an emerging field of inquiry in psychology and related disciplines. Over the past decades, significant advances have been made in connected areas – counterfactual thinking, anticipation, prospection, imagination and creativity, etc. – and several calls have been formulated in the social sciences to study human beings and societies as systems that are open to possibility and to the future. However, engaging with the possible, in the sense of both becoming aware of it and actively exploring it, represents a subject in need of further theoretical elaboration. In this paper, I review several existing approaches to the possible before briefly outlining a new, sociocultural account. While the former are focused on cognitive processes and uphold the old dichotomy between the possible and the actual or real, the latter grows out of a social ontology grounded in notions of difference, positions, perspectives, reflexivity, and dialogue. In the end, I argue that a better understanding of the possible can help us cultivate it in both mind and society.

Keyword(s)

possible imagination creativity counterfactuals anticipation sociocultural psychology

Persistent Identifier

Date of first publication

2018-08-31

Journal title

Europe's Journal of Psychology

Volume

14

Issue

3

Page numbers

519–530

Publisher

PsychOpen GOLD

Publication status

publishedVersion

Review status

notReviewed

Is version of

Citation

Glăveanu, V. P. (2018). The possible as a field of inquiry. Europe's Journal of Psychology, 14(3), 519–530. https://doi.org/10.5964/ejop.v14i3.1725
  • Author(s) / Creator(s)
    Glăveanu, Vlad Petre
  • PsychArchives acquisition timestamp
    2018-11-21T10:00:31Z
  • Made available on
    2018-11-21T10:00:31Z
  • Date of first publication
    2018-08-31
  • Abstract / Description
    In this editorial I introduce the possible as an emerging field of inquiry in psychology and related disciplines. Over the past decades, significant advances have been made in connected areas – counterfactual thinking, anticipation, prospection, imagination and creativity, etc. – and several calls have been formulated in the social sciences to study human beings and societies as systems that are open to possibility and to the future. However, engaging with the possible, in the sense of both becoming aware of it and actively exploring it, represents a subject in need of further theoretical elaboration. In this paper, I review several existing approaches to the possible before briefly outlining a new, sociocultural account. While the former are focused on cognitive processes and uphold the old dichotomy between the possible and the actual or real, the latter grows out of a social ontology grounded in notions of difference, positions, perspectives, reflexivity, and dialogue. In the end, I argue that a better understanding of the possible can help us cultivate it in both mind and society.
    en_US
  • Publication status
    publishedVersion
  • Review status
    notReviewed
  • Citation
    Glăveanu, V. P. (2018). The possible as a field of inquiry. Europe's Journal of Psychology, 14(3), 519–530. https://doi.org/10.5964/ejop.v14i3.1725
  • ISSN
    1841-0413
  • Persistent Identifier
    https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12034/1127
  • Persistent Identifier
    https://doi.org/10.23668/psycharchives.1319
  • Language of content
    eng
  • Publisher
    PsychOpen GOLD
  • Is version of
    https://doi.org/10.5964/ejop.v14i3.1725
  • Keyword(s)
    possible
    en_US
  • Keyword(s)
    imagination
    en_US
  • Keyword(s)
    creativity
    en_US
  • Keyword(s)
    counterfactuals
    en_US
  • Keyword(s)
    anticipation
    en_US
  • Keyword(s)
    sociocultural psychology
    en_US
  • Dewey Decimal Classification number(s)
    150
  • Title
    The possible as a field of inquiry
    en_US
  • DRO type
    article
  • Issue
    3
  • Journal title
    Europe's Journal of Psychology
  • Page numbers
    519–530
  • Volume
    14
  • Visible tag(s)
    Version of Record