Article Accepted Manuscript

Attitudes and expectations towards mental health interventions in the general population: Comparing face-to-face counseling, blended counseling, and digital or on-paper self-help [Author Accepted Manuscript]

Author(s) / Creator(s)

De Witte, Nele
Buelens, Fien
Apolinário-Hagen, Jennifer
Van Daele, Tom

Abstract / Description

Background: Digital interventions are supported by a growing evidence base and have the potential to contribute to accessible and personalized mental healthcare services. When individuals seek help for mental health problems, various intervention options are available in a digital, face-to-face or on-paper format. However, it is important to understand what individuals find important for intervention selection and how they perceive different intervention options. Method: The study recruited 232 individuals for a cross-sectional online survey on (1) the relevance of 12 evaluation dimensions for mental health support, (2) whether self-help books, digital interventions, face-to-face counseling, and blended interventions would meet expectations, and (3) self-reported likelihood of use. Results: The most important dimensions for intervention selection were helpfulness, personal support, motivates to get better, and credibility. Face-to-face counseling was evaluated favorably for dimensions linked to intervention content (e.g., helpfulness), while self-help approaches were rated more positively for practical aspects (e.g., waiting time). Blended counseling received fairly similar dimension ratings as face-to-face counseling. Self-reported likelihood of use differed significantly between modalities despite large individual differences. Face-to-face interventions were most likely used, followed by blended counseling and a shared third rank for digital and on-paper self-help options. Conclusion: The findings suggests that mere self-help (online or on paper) does not sufficiently meet the needs and is not the preferred choice for handling mental health problems for most individuals. If presented with the choice, individuals still prefer face-to-face counseling. Nevertheless, blended interventions can be a promising treatment option for the future.

Keyword(s)

Mental healthcare technology acceptance self-help digital mental health blended care

Persistent Identifier

Date of first publication

2025-08-19

Journal title

Clinical Psychology in Europe

Publisher

PsychArchives

Publication status

acceptedVersion

Review status

reviewed

Is version of

Citation

De Witte, N., Buelens, F., Apolinário-Hagen, J., & Van Daele, T. (in press). Attitudes and expectations towards mental health interventions in the general population: Comparing face-to-face counseling, blended counseling, and digital or on-paper self-help [Author Accepted Manuscript]. Clinical Psychology in Europe. https://doi.org/10.23668/psycharchives.21149
  • Author(s) / Creator(s)
    De Witte, Nele
  • Author(s) / Creator(s)
    Buelens, Fien
  • Author(s) / Creator(s)
    Apolinário-Hagen, Jennifer
  • Author(s) / Creator(s)
    Van Daele, Tom
  • PsychArchives acquisition timestamp
    2025-08-19T18:43:59Z
  • Made available on
    2025-08-19T18:43:59Z
  • Date of first publication
    2025-08-19
  • Abstract / Description
    Background: Digital interventions are supported by a growing evidence base and have the potential to contribute to accessible and personalized mental healthcare services. When individuals seek help for mental health problems, various intervention options are available in a digital, face-to-face or on-paper format. However, it is important to understand what individuals find important for intervention selection and how they perceive different intervention options. Method: The study recruited 232 individuals for a cross-sectional online survey on (1) the relevance of 12 evaluation dimensions for mental health support, (2) whether self-help books, digital interventions, face-to-face counseling, and blended interventions would meet expectations, and (3) self-reported likelihood of use. Results: The most important dimensions for intervention selection were helpfulness, personal support, motivates to get better, and credibility. Face-to-face counseling was evaluated favorably for dimensions linked to intervention content (e.g., helpfulness), while self-help approaches were rated more positively for practical aspects (e.g., waiting time). Blended counseling received fairly similar dimension ratings as face-to-face counseling. Self-reported likelihood of use differed significantly between modalities despite large individual differences. Face-to-face interventions were most likely used, followed by blended counseling and a shared third rank for digital and on-paper self-help options. Conclusion: The findings suggests that mere self-help (online or on paper) does not sufficiently meet the needs and is not the preferred choice for handling mental health problems for most individuals. If presented with the choice, individuals still prefer face-to-face counseling. Nevertheless, blended interventions can be a promising treatment option for the future.
    en
  • Publication status
    acceptedVersion
  • Review status
    reviewed
  • Citation
    De Witte, N., Buelens, F., Apolinário-Hagen, J., & Van Daele, T. (in press). Attitudes and expectations towards mental health interventions in the general population: Comparing face-to-face counseling, blended counseling, and digital or on-paper self-help [Author Accepted Manuscript]. Clinical Psychology in Europe. https://doi.org/10.23668/psycharchives.21149
  • ISSN
    2625-3410
  • Persistent Identifier
    https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12034/16550
  • Persistent Identifier
    https://doi.org/10.23668/psycharchives.21149
  • Language of content
    eng
  • Publisher
    PsychArchives
  • Is version of
    https://doi.org/10.32872/cpe.16235
  • Keyword(s)
    Mental healthcare
  • Keyword(s)
    technology acceptance
  • Keyword(s)
    self-help
  • Keyword(s)
    digital mental health
  • Keyword(s)
    blended care
  • Dewey Decimal Classification number(s)
    150
  • Title
    Attitudes and expectations towards mental health interventions in the general population: Comparing face-to-face counseling, blended counseling, and digital or on-paper self-help [Author Accepted Manuscript]
    en
  • DRO type
    article
  • Journal title
    Clinical Psychology in Europe
  • Visible tag(s)
    PsychOpen GOLD
  • Visible tag(s)
    Accepted Manuscript