study number
archive version
Digital Object Identifier
survey year
survey period
ID interviewee
interview date
beginning of the interview
end of the interview
interview duration in minutes
only reuse
creation of primary data outweighs reuse
creation of primary data and reuse are equal
answering new research questions
examination of the reproducibility
meta-analyses
illustration of methods
re-analyses
teaching
dimension reduction (e.g. principal component analysis)
simulation studies
methodological research
codebook
information on study quality/reliability
study protocol
scripts
statistical characteristics
machine readable/standardized metadata
links
none
combining data from studies examining similar research questions
archival data
behavioral data
physiological and psychobiological data
questionnaire data
biomedical data
one's own data
recent studies
PISA-study
bio-medical/psychobiological data are better than behavioral data
self-reports and survey data
applied studies
old studies
behavioral data are worse than biomedical/physiological data
EEG data
behavioral empirical data
qualitative studies
individual reasons
research infrastructure
(lack of) discipline-specific RDM culture
no differences in the documentation quality
complexity of the data
responsibilities
list with data file names and descriptions
effect sizes
provenance
coding scheme
yes
no
actually yes, but also dependent on data user
estimation not possible
faculties’ own checklists
no use of any known standards
Ruben Arslans codebook
orientation along the community
code/syntax, data preparation and analyses scripts
standardized metadata